Stargate Information Archive

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Search     Help     Rules     Members V     Calendar V     Live Chat V  
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Nefertum, Is a System Lord?
Anubis94
post Jan 28th 2004, 9:57 PM
Post #1


Airman First Class
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 72
Joined: October 29th 2003
From: Men-nef-er
Member No.: 2,646
Gender: Male



On the episode where the Bedrosian, Nayan said that they were brought there by Nefertum through the gateway. Well Teal'c said that he was an under System Lord to Ra the Supreme System Lord. What exactly is an Under System Lord and will we get to see him on SG-1?

Anubis94
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Annunaki
post Jan 28th 2004, 10:09 PM
Post #2


Colonel
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,617
Joined: October 10th 2003
Member No.: 2,478
Gender: Not Telling



Since we haven't seen how the goa'uld structure is like when there is a Supreme System lord I don't think we ever will see an Under system lord.

I don't know but it is probably the rank given to goa'uld who serve the supreme system lord.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Apis
post Jan 28th 2004, 10:30 PM
Post #3


Major General
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2,474
Joined: March 15th 2003
From: Canada
Member No.: 1,116
Gender: Male



Well we do know that the Goa'uld seem to have a heirarchial structure. I mean, in "Last Stand" Baal's Lo'tar said that he wished to "One day ascend to the rank of system lord".

Don't get me wrong, however, I do not believe that the Goa'uld hand out promotions to other Goa'uld's to help them raise in rank. I say this because the Goa'uld's social order is based upon feudalism; and in feudalism nothing is written in stone. Rank probably directly proportional to military strength (for example, if Goa'uld "A" beats Goa'uld "B" in a fight than in later confrontations Goa'uld "A" will automatically be treated as "Alpa").

So I would assume that by calling Nefertum an "Under System Lord"; Teal'c probably was saying that while this Goa'uld is strong enough to weild considerable power; his armies are not strong enough to make any of the more powerful Goa'uld yeild to him.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Raz
post Jan 29th 2004, 4:16 AM
Post #4


Colonel
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,817
Joined: February 18th 2003
From: North-East England, UK
Member No.: 726
Gender: Male



I doubt we will get to see Nefertum however an under system lord could be like a slave to the System Lord. For example Bynar was servant to Sokar. Now that Ra is dead though and there is a major doubt any other Goa'uld will rise to supreme power, I doubt there will be any minor system lords or under system lords to see.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Baal
post Jan 29th 2004, 2:20 PM
Post #5


Captain
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 917
Joined: January 4th 2004
From: Where the action is
Member No.: 3,136
Gender: Male



Maybe Ra conquered him.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Annunaki
post Jan 29th 2004, 3:50 PM
Post #6


Colonel
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,617
Joined: October 10th 2003
Member No.: 2,478
Gender: Not Telling



Since Teal'c was referring to an under system lord to Ra the under system lord might be the rank given to another goa'uld by a supreme system lord and not by a regular system lord. Since the supreme system lord Ra must have been very busy Nefertum could have controled some of his forces. Nefertum would have been fine with following Ra's orders since no other system lord could challenge Ra's forces.

Anubis was trying to take over every other system lord with the help of Osiris. If he would have succeeded and became the supreme system lord then Osiris most likely would have became an under system lord to Anubis.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dorien
post Jan 29th 2004, 8:03 PM
Post #7


Major
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,070
Joined: June 10th 2003
From: yooperland
Member No.: 1,776
Gender: Female



I take the title to mean a goa'uld who serves Under the command of a System Lord. For example: Tanith served Apophis and then Anubis. Zipacna also serves Anubis as does Osiris. Jacob/Selmak "served" Lord Yu. Kianna served Ba'al. Etc.

But as every goa'uld seeks power, I'm sure there is no trust in the relationship/service and there are always intrigues and schemes to seize power for oneself. I wouldn't get too hung up on the adjectives used in the titles. The goa'uld have huge egos. If one is a System Lord of course another will go for one-up-manship and add Supreme. And then put down others by adding Under or Minor to the title. Head games. wink.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Aesir
post Jan 29th 2004, 8:09 PM
Post #8


Major General
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 4,404
Joined: June 14th 2003
From: United Kingdom
Member No.: 1,811
Gender: Male



QUOTE (Anubis94 @ Jan 29 2004, 02:57 AM)
On the episode where the Bedrosian, Nayan said that they were brought there by Nefertum through the gateway. Well Teal'c said that he was an under System Lord to Ra the Supreme System Lord. What exactly is an Under System Lord and will we get to see him on SG-1?

Although (as people have already said), the hierarchy of Goa'uld is probably significantly different now from when Ra was alive, I'm guess it means that Nefertum was a System Lord who served Ra (presumably most or all of them did in some way or another), or simply a minor Goa'uld in Ra's service. Anyway, we do know that Nefertum is not currently a System Lord and so unless he fell from power and was defeated, he may well be a minor Goa'uld. Basically we don't know, but I seriously doubt we will see Nefertum of hear another mention of him.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Heru'ur
post Jan 29th 2004, 9:50 PM
Post #9


Major
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,221
Joined: May 27th 2003
From: Abydos
Member No.: 1,671
Gender: Male



Nefertum is most liklely an isignificant goa'uld. Or he died a long time ago. No recent evidence has suggested that he is still alive or has any power. If he did, we would have seen it. He was most likely defeated or conquered a thousand years ago.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
S.G.C
post Jan 29th 2004, 10:49 PM
Post #10


Major General
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2,675
Joined: November 10th 2003
From: Australia
Member No.: 2,714
Gender: Male



Ra was pritty much the king of the system lords. Seeing that the abidos (spelling) mission killed him i dont think that we will be seeing another king goa'uld. Though anubis died. So who knows. king.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lit Gal
post Jan 30th 2004, 10:54 PM
Post #11


Second Lieutenant
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 616
Joined: December 19th 2003
From: Arizona
Member No.: 3,031
Gender: Female



Nefertum obviously appeared on Earth, but he couldn't have been a slave to Ra the way that we see Zippy serving more powerful goa'uld because he had told the people of the planet that he was the one and only god (which I don't think Zippy or Thoth could get away with doing without having their "masters" castrate them). So, maybe an Under System Lord is an up and coming goa'uld or a goa'uld who only controls a couple of planets and so aligns with a larger System Lord for protection. Maybe there's a genetic relationship like with Apophis and Klor'el (sp). Maybe we'll never know because the writers have dropped this idea totally.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
necrosis
post Jan 31st 2004, 6:38 AM
Post #12


Technical Sergeant
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 275
Joined: July 15th 2003
From: dublin,ireland
Member No.: 2,033
Gender: Male



well to anwser your last question,no we will probably not being seeing nefertum ever,as the humans on bedrosia were advanced enough,i'd say they got rid of nefertum thousands of years ago.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Lit Gal
post Jan 31st 2004, 12:22 PM
Post #13


Second Lieutenant
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 616
Joined: December 19th 2003
From: Arizona
Member No.: 3,031
Gender: Female



My complaint about the writers dropping the issue is not in reference to Nefertum per se. I wish we would see more of the goa'uld power structure. In Summit we got to see a bit of how the System Lords interact, but I would like to know how the little goa'uld interact with the lords. When Selmac goes under cover in Lord Yu's service, what exactly is his role? I want to see under system lords in general -- not necessarily Nefertum.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Apis
post Jan 31st 2004, 3:23 PM
Post #14


Major General
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 2,474
Joined: March 15th 2003
From: Canada
Member No.: 1,116
Gender: Male



QUOTE (Lit Gal @ Jan 31 2004, 10:22 AM)
My complaint about the writers dropping the issue is not in reference to Nefertum per se. I wish we would see more of the goa'uld power structure. In Summit we got to see a bit of how the System Lords interact, but I would like to know how the little goa'uld interact with the lords. When Selmac goes under cover in Lord Yu's service, what exactly is his role? I want to see under system lords in general -- not necessarily Nefertum.

I always thought that the Goa'uld power structure was oriented around specializations. For example, in the episode "Double Jeopardy" that woman (Goa'uld) who was in service of Cronus seemed to be specializing in technology. Other Goa'uld such as the one who was torturing Teal'c in "The Serpeant's Venom"; seemed to specialize in Goa'uld interrogation. So I would suspect that an Under Goa'uld's relation to the "head" System Lord would be heavily based on the current demand for what they specialize in; and these "under Goa'uld" would be able to rise to power under basis of how useful their speciality is (for example, in a time of extreme technological advancement; a Goa'uld who specializes in technology would be more important and thus, would have less difficulty raising an army to overthrow their master and become a full-fledged system lord).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: July 31st 2010 - 10:50 AM
Stargate Information Archive

Stargate SG-1 © 1997-2010 MGM Worldwide Television, Inc.
Stargate Atlantis © 2004-2010 MGM Worldwide Television, Inc.
Text and images from this site may not be used without permission.

All comments on these pages belong to the author of those comments, and
do not necessarily reflect the views of the Stargate Information Archive.