Stargate Information Archive

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 Search     Help     Rules     Members V     Calendar V     Live Chat V  
3 Pages V  1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> If Earth Had "Federation" Technology, Star Trek Goodies In A Stargate Universe
Would "Federation" Technology Make A Difference Against The Goa'uld?
Would "Federation" Technology Make A Difference Against The Goa'uld?
Yes. [ 67 ] ** [64.42%]
No, but it would make the space battles interesting. [ 28 ] ** [26.92%]
Let's let Big Blue Buddha decide! :p [ 9 ] ** [8.65%]
Total Votes: 104
Guests cannot vote 
Mike
post May 14th 2003, 2:11 PM
Post #1


I Piss Excellence
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,015
Joined: March 4th 2003
From: New York, NY / Houston, TX
Member No.: 957
Gender: Male



This was something that kinda dawned on me while I was eating my chips and queso with SportsCenter in the background (like you really wanted to know that). wink.gif

Let put together a situation in which the SGC have technology much like the Federation of Planets in the Star Trek Universe. I'm talking ships like Enterprise, quantom photon torpedos, transporter technology, advanced medicine, personal force shield for the troops, all the bells and whistles. Do you think such technology would make a difference in the fight against the Gou'ald?

If we think about it, Earth can be wiped out in one fatal blow if the Gou'ald got their act together and focused their resources towards the SGC and Earth. The saving grace that has kept the Earth in tact has been the constant bickering among the system lords for power and their arrogance and underestimation towards the Tau'ri.

Yet there was the protective planets treaty that seem to protect Earth for a short time but it is all but usless now and less face it, treaties are created to be broken at some point. The SGC has proven time and time again that a battle is won by smarts rather than relying on superior firepower and manpower. Yes SG-1 is good but they are also lucky.

My viewpoint in all this is that Federation type weapons who be a nice boost, but it takes more than technology to win a war.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stargatesweetie
post May 14th 2003, 2:45 PM
Post #2


Lieutenant Colonel
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,518
Joined: February 24th 2003
From: Birmingham UK
Member No.: 846
Gender: Female



Agreed, a concerted effort on behalf of the Goa'uld would have taken us out years ago. However we would definitely have an advantage with Federation technology, "simple" things like transporters would be of great use and Doc Frasiers job would be easier!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MacGyver2
post May 14th 2003, 2:48 PM
Post #3


Colonel
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,724
Joined: February 12th 2003
From: Romania (Europe)
Member No.: 634



I don't think so.
It's the people that use the technology, not the technology, that makes the difference.

I for one would stick to the old Tauri ingenuity.
It never failed us before.

Besides, the StarTrek stuff would look "out of place" in the world of Stargate. Everything in neat and tidy in StarTrek.
Phasers would look silly in Stargate.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
FatJoe
post May 14th 2003, 3:16 PM
Post #4


Airman First Class
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 61
Joined: May 1st 2003
Member No.: 1,492



What's the difference between Zats and Phasers anyway, both weapons I'd say are "neat and tidy"...

Actually as of the end of season 6, the tech available to the SGC is near the same level as that of Star Trek in many ways...the prometheus w/asgard weapons and shields is a good example....Zats and Staff Weapons are equal to if not better than phasers...and those naquada enriched nukes pack a hell of a punch...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lordyu
post May 14th 2003, 7:14 PM
Post #5


Staff Sergeant
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: February 13th 2003
Member No.: 652



the power difference of the ship are to great. a ship like the enterprize from star trak are not that powerfull. if you goto the star trek site and convert there shield power to megatons, it only come out to 18 megatons.
we know that in one episode sam said that the canons on the mothership were putting out up to 200 megatons pershot. so as you can see it would only take one shot from a gao'uld mothership. to bring down the shield and completey distroy a ship like the enterprize.
the weapons on star trek ship only have a power range of 100 to 800 kilotons. with that amount of fire power it would take all day to bring the shield of a gao'uld mothership. we also know that the gao'uld shield can take hits of 500 megatons and up. it would be like a fly hitting the windsheild of a car.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Behenna
post May 14th 2003, 7:43 PM
Post #6


Major
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,084
Joined: March 18th 2003
From: Near Oxford in a little village
Member No.: 1,143
Gender: Male



the startrek tech compared 2 goauld tech would be how the goauld are 2 us at start of season 1!, way 2 advanced, hell the enterprise D war drive section alone could most prob take out a goauld mothership!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lordyu
post May 15th 2003, 1:59 AM
Post #7


Staff Sergeant
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: February 13th 2003
Member No.: 652



well i wouldn't go that fare. the feds tech is more advance in some areas. the advantage that the goa'ulds have over the feds is there fire power, shield strenght, speed and healing divce.
the feds have better transporters, replicators to make them thing no need for storage, and halo deck. but that stuff do no good in a fire fight with a goa'uld mothership.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Doomgoggles
post May 15th 2003, 3:09 AM
Post #8


Technical Sergeant
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 238
Joined: March 17th 2003
From: Seattle, WA
Member No.: 1,132
Gender: Male



okay....we know that the shields on most Federation ships can take several hits from quantom torpedos, which are many times more powerful than nuclear weapons. quantum torpedos actually disrupt space-fabric...photon torpedos are filled with separated matter and anti-matter packets which are combined during the time of impact, resulting in an explosion.

the numbers from the technical manuals and the star trek website really don't mean anything, since they don't have any consistency.

I would say that Federation technology is about on par with the Tollan (400-600 years ahead of us).

As for the phasers, they are supposed to be 'phased energy weapons' which are basically what the Goa'uld weapons are as well...so...like the Goa'uld weapons, they would be able to damage or penetrate shields.

The transporters are definatly way more advanced than the ring-transporters. they're faster and they can work anywhere...
The Goa'uld would still be ahead in terms of medical technology (able to raise the dead).

So basically, yes: Earth would be able to create defense platforms to defend itself. however, this technology would require a tremendous amount of resources, meaning we'd have to mine the moon and Mars...creating the need for additional defenses.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Einstein
post May 15th 2003, 3:38 AM
Post #9


Unregistered









QUOTE (lordyu @ May 14 2003, 07:14 PM)
the power difference of the ship are to great. a ship like the enterprize from star trak are not that powerfull. if you goto the star trek site and convert there shield power to megatons, it only come out to 18 megatons.
we know that in one episode sam said that the canons on the mothership were putting out up to 200 megatons pershot. so as you can see it would only take one shot from a gao'uld mothership. to bring down the shield and completey distroy a ship like the enterprize.

I'd have to disagree on that one sorry! Given that BACK IN ("1961") the worlds biggest nuclear device was (58 megatons) which were detonated over Novaya Zemlya 30 october in 1961,

And the russians where working on a 100 megaton yield at that time, but never tested it!

Id say that in 400-600 years, theyd'e have weapons way more powerful than 500 megatons!
Which would be at the startrek level of technology! And also the tolans level!

So id say that federation technology is way more advanced than gould Tech!

I think the federation dont build massive ships for treaty reasons! like the treaty where they cant use cloaking technology!
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lordyu
post May 15th 2003, 5:17 AM
Post #10


Staff Sergeant
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: February 13th 2003
Member No.: 652



well you have to understand i base my figure off the fact that i get from the star trek spec site. and they base the info off the series and books and games. so there is no dispute the figure dont lie there weapon are just way to weak. to do any damage to a goa'uld mothership.

here are the spec if u dont beleave me and if u dont i went to the site ill give u that to.

this are the spec for a gallexy class ship"enterprize"
14 x Type X Phaser arrays, total phaser output 70,000 TeraWatts = 16.74 megatons
Shield system, total capacity 5,103,000 TeraJoules= 1,219.64 megatons
3 x Type 3 burst fire photon torpedo tubes + 275 torpedoes
Antimatter spread emitter. = 12megatons each total 36 megatons
Normal Cruise : Warp Factor 6
Maximum Cruise : Warp Factor 9.2
Maximum Rated : Warp Factor 9.9 for twelve hours
http://www.ditl.org/

sorry i put spec for Ambassador class with it was suppost to be the gallexy class well i change it to the right one

This post has been edited by lordyu: May 15th 2003, 12:53 PM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Einstein
post May 15th 2003, 5:22 AM
Post #11


Unregistered









I agree lordyu, Just saying i think well have some great hard ware in a few hundred years! tongue.gif blink.gif biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
weasel
post May 15th 2003, 11:26 AM
Post #12


Captain
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 823
Joined: February 28th 2003
From: Reading, England
Member No.: 904
Gender: Male



Do you remember in the startrek film "first contact" piccard killed some Borg using a Tommy-gun in the holodeck?

Well why don't they use guns against the borg? since they aren't energy weapons, it would be pretty hard to adapt.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mighty Thor
post May 15th 2003, 3:46 PM
Post #13


Lieutenant Colonel
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,315
Joined: May 12th 2003
From: Wales,Uk
Member No.: 1,583
Gender: Male



The ships are computer genareted really dadly(on planets)on startek, anyway, startrek tech is scientifacally flawed online2long.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
weasel
post May 16th 2003, 1:34 AM
Post #14


Captain
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 823
Joined: February 28th 2003
From: Reading, England
Member No.: 904
Gender: Male



QUOTE
The ships are computer genareted really dadly(on planets)on startek, anyway, startrek tech is scientifacally flawed


Are you going to back that up with something? or is this just part of your spamming plan which gives you a rating of over 20 posts per day?

I read somewhere that the startrek writers read through magazines like "new scientist" to get ideas. They are only theoretical at that point, my my point is that practically everything they do has some basis in theoretical/ accepted science.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lordyu
post May 16th 2003, 2:01 AM
Post #15


Staff Sergeant
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 182
Joined: February 13th 2003
Member No.: 652



the techs on star trek are all sound ideas there all base on scientific ideas. so if you got a Phd of your own in physics you can go argue with them about it.

heres some fact for you Scientists at NEC Corporation's have made light particls move 1.5 times faster then the speed of light with out it being distroyed. this was thought to be impossible just a little will back.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
OdinisThor'sDad
post May 16th 2003, 6:35 AM
Post #16


ASSgards are pussies!
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 7,207
Joined: January 29th 2003
From: Asan, South Korea (that's the good one)
Member No.: 490
Gender: Male



Making something move faster than light is impossible.........how did they measure these light 'particles'
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
weasel
post May 16th 2003, 9:15 AM
Post #17


Captain
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 823
Joined: February 28th 2003
From: Reading, England
Member No.: 904
Gender: Male



QUOTE
heres some fact for you Scientists at NEC Corporation's have made light particls move 1.5 times faster then the speed of light with out it being distroyed. this was thought to be impossible just a little will back.


do you mean they got light to travel faster than 3X10^8? cool- that would make it a, its on the tip of my tongue- tachyon, wooohoo, startrek is closer than we think.

I heard a while ago that they made elelctrons go faster than light, but only beacuse by passing it through a material, it slowed the light enough for the electrons to overtake.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Drizzt Do'Urden
post May 16th 2003, 10:40 AM
Post #18


Second Lieutenant
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 537
Joined: March 12th 2003
From: a galaxy far, far away
Member No.: 1,083



QUOTE (OdinisThor'sDad @ May 16 2003, 06:35 AM)
Making something move faster than light is impossible.........how did they measure these light 'particles'

what happens if you're flying at the speed of light and turn on your headlights?

anyway, it depends on what tech we'd be getting, and who we'd be using it against. seriously, picture a federation ship trying to go against abubis's ship& the eye of ra. alien.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mighty Thor
post May 16th 2003, 10:53 AM
Post #19


Lieutenant Colonel
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,315
Joined: May 12th 2003
From: Wales,Uk
Member No.: 1,583
Gender: Male



Hey, we had the turn on your headlights discussion before, no not again.....
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
OdinisThor'sDad
post May 17th 2003, 12:55 AM
Post #20


ASSgards are pussies!
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 7,207
Joined: January 29th 2003
From: Asan, South Korea (that's the good one)
Member No.: 490
Gender: Male



QUOTE (Drizzt Do'Urden @ May 17 2003, 12:40 AM)
QUOTE (OdinisThor'sDad @ May 16 2003, 06:35 AM)
Making something move faster than light is impossible.........how did they measure these light 'particles'

what happens if you're flying at the speed of light and turn on your headlights?

anyway, it depends on what tech we'd be getting, and who we'd be using it against. seriously, picture a federation ship trying to go against abubis's ship& the eye of ra. alien.gif

Look at realitivity.

How about walking and carrying a flashlight.

V1+V2....right....

Wrong
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mighty Thor
post May 17th 2003, 5:05 AM
Post #21


Lieutenant Colonel
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,315
Joined: May 12th 2003
From: Wales,Uk
Member No.: 1,583
Gender: Male



you can measure the amount of energy from the light beam, i guess you figure out then how charged they are and how many online2long.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dafmeister
post May 17th 2003, 5:54 AM
Post #22


General
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,905
Joined: April 10th 2003
From: North Wales, UK
Member No.: 1,340
Gender: Male



QUOTE (OdinisThor'sDad @ May 17 2003, 12:55 AM)
QUOTE (Drizzt Do'Urden @ May 17 2003, 12:40 AM)
QUOTE (OdinisThor'sDad @ May 16 2003, 06:35 AM)
Making something move faster than light is impossible.........how did they measure these light 'particles'

what happens if you're flying at the speed of light and turn on your headlights?

anyway, it depends on what tech we'd be getting, and who we'd be using it against. seriously, picture a federation ship trying to go against abubis's ship& the eye of ra. alien.gif

Look at realitivity.

How about walking and carrying a flashlight.

V1+V2....right....

Wrong

Aaaarrrgggghhh............please no more physics. i studied that for three years at college and it hurt. my brain melted on many occasions. tongue.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mighty Thor
post May 17th 2003, 7:15 AM
Post #23


Lieutenant Colonel
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1,315
Joined: May 12th 2003
From: Wales,Uk
Member No.: 1,583
Gender: Male



1. how would they have got the tech?
2.when in startrek do they have personal shields?, sounds like goa'uld tech
3.the tollan are living(dead laugh.gif )proof that it takes more than tech
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike
post May 17th 2003, 9:28 AM
Post #24


I Piss Excellence
Group Icon

Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,015
Joined: March 4th 2003
From: New York, NY / Houston, TX
Member No.: 957
Gender: Male



QUOTE (Mighty Thor @ May 17 2003, 07:15 AM)
2.when in startrek do they have personal shields?, sounds like goa'uld tech

It was mentioned in an episode of Deep Space 9 when the Dominion was threatening invasion of earth. Captain Sisko asked Star Fleet command to dispatch Federation troop patrols throughout the planet complete with rifles and personal force shields.

Kinda weird seeing Federation officiers patrolling the French Quarter in New Orleans.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: July 31st 2010 - 11:02 AM
Stargate Information Archive

Stargate SG-1 © 1997-2010 MGM Worldwide Television, Inc.
Stargate Atlantis © 2004-2010 MGM Worldwide Television, Inc.
Text and images from this site may not be used without permission.

All comments on these pages belong to the author of those comments, and
do not necessarily reflect the views of the Stargate Information Archive.