 Go'uld Healing Technology |
|
||
|
|
Stargate SG-1: General Discussion
This area is for general discussion of Stargate SG-1 only. SG-1 spoilers belong in the Spoilers & Speculation section. There are separate categories for Stargate Atlantis Discussion and Stargate Universe Discussion. Complete forum rules are available here.
SG-1 Index: General Discussion |
Spoilers & Speculation |
Specific Episode Discussion
  |
| StarFighter |
 Apr 23rd 2011, 4:19 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Staff Sergeant  Group: Members Posts: 204 Joined: December 19th 2006 Member No.: 12,924 Gender: Male  |
Has it ever bugged anyone else that Stargate Command never messed with healing technology? Clearly it worked and was safe with limited use. Was it ever explained why they ditched the healing technology?
|
   |
 
|
| Dafmeister |
Apr 24th 2011, 2:44 AM
Post
#2
|
|
General  Group: Moderators Posts: 11,926 Joined: April 10th 2003 From: North Wales, UK Member No.: 1,340 Gender: Male |
I didnt think they had much success with healing tech. The sarcophagus had a bad effect of the mental stability of its user and the healing hand device could only be used by some who knew how to use it and had naquada in their blood.
I would say it was abandonned simply because it could have solved any problem they had with any person dying. |
|
|
|
| StarFighter |
Apr 25th 2011, 4:09 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Staff Sergeant Group: Members Posts: 204 Joined: December 19th 2006 Member No.: 12,924 Gender: Male |
QUOTE(Dafmeister @ Apr 24th 2011, 3:44 AM)  I didnt think they had much success with healing tech. The sarcophagus had a bad effect of the mental stability of its user and the healing hand device could only be used by some who knew how to use it and had naquada in their blood. But in limited use the sarcophagus seemed safe. Daniel Jackson used it a couple times and O'neill used it many when he was tortured by Ba'al. QUOTE(Dafmeister @ Apr 24th 2011, 3:44 AM) I would say it was abandonned simply because it could have solved any problem they had with any person dying. Agreed. |
|
|
|
| Dafmeister |
Apr 30th 2011, 9:14 AM
Post
#4
|
|
General Group: Moderators Posts: 11,926 Joined: April 10th 2003 From: North Wales, UK Member No.: 1,340 Gender: Male |
QUOTE(StarFighter @ Apr 25th 2011, 10:09 PM) But in limited use the sarcophagus seemed safe. Daniel Jackson used it a couple times and O'neill used it many when he was tortured by Ba'al. One or two times may be ok but Daniel seemed to suffer pretty quickly when he continually used it - cant remember the ep named but Daniel saved that princess when she was about to kill herself and the rest of SG-1 were put to work in the naquada mines. It seemed addictive so it may not have been safe to used in limited quantities. |
|
|
|
| Shylodog |
Apr 30th 2011, 3:24 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Chief Master Sergeant  Group: Moderators Posts: 412 Joined: March 15th 2007 From: Reno, Nevada USA Member No.: 13,463 Gender: Male |
QUOTE(Dafmeister @ Apr 30th 2011, 7:14 AM) One or two times may be ok but Daniel seemed to suffer pretty quickly when he continually used it - cant remember the ep named but Daniel saved that princess when she was about to kill herself and the rest of SG-1 were put to work in the naquada mines. It seemed addictive so it may not have been safe to used in limited quantities. My thoughts were always that they should have kept it and used it only under a doctor's care, overseen by a governmental agency (or something like that). Morphine is just as addictive and just as deadly. But for all we know, aside from revivng the dead and patching holes in people, the curative effects on deseases could be temporary. |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: May 22nd 2013 - 9:47 AM |
|
||
|
|
|