 918 - Arthur's Mantle |
Rating  |
|
||
|
|
  |
| Ancient Kane |
 May 28th 2006, 9:10 AM
Post
#121
|
|
Unregistered  |
its funny how in all these years tilk is still the same. Lmao u would of thought seeing mitchell would of made him slightly change his facial expression. Maybe he cant cause he didnt even seem upset when Janet (bless her sole) died. LOVE YOU CASSANDRA
|
 
|
|
| Revan |
Jun 5th 2006, 1:20 PM
Post
#122
|
|
Dark Lord of The Sith  Group: Moderators Posts: 4,455 Joined: February 1st 2006 From: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A., Terra Firma Member No.: 11,056 Gender: Male |
QUOTE(Ancient Kane @ May 28th 2006, 10:10 AM)  its funny how in all these years tilk is still the same. Lmao u would of thought seeing mitchell would of made him slightly change his facial expression. Maybe he cant cause he didnt even seem upset when Janet (bless her sole) died. LOVE YOU CASSANDRA I thought he seemed upset when Janet died. His expressions are subtle. I am sure he was simply unsurprised when he saw Cam... he probably got used to that sort of thing. Teal'c is his name. This post has been edited by Revan: Jun 5th 2006, 1:20 PM |
   |
|
| Dafmeister |
Jun 5th 2006, 2:05 PM
Post
#123
|
|
General  Group: Moderators Posts: 11,926 Joined: April 10th 2003 From: North Wales, UK Member No.: 1,340 Gender: Male |
You can tell he was upset when he was talking to Sam about what to say at Fraiser's memorial. He doesn't show that he is upset in his facial expressions very often but you can tell in the way he speaks.
|
|
|
|
| KillerMarv |
Jun 5th 2006, 6:08 PM
Post
#124
|
|
Major General Group: Members Posts: 3,441 Joined: April 7th 2006 From: Bucharest, Romania Member No.: 11,622 Gender: Male |
We can see how much Teal'c misses and cares about Janet Fraiser in Ripple Effect, when he and Daniel talk to the alternate one... We can see that both in the way he talks, and his eyes...
But enough about all this, this topic should be about Arthur's Mantle. |
|
|
|
| KillerMarv |
Jun 28th 2006, 5:45 PM
Post
#125
|
|
Major General Group: Members Posts: 3,441 Joined: April 7th 2006 From: Bucharest, Romania Member No.: 11,622 Gender: Male |
OK, here's an obvious question. In Babylon we are told that the Sodan haven't carried symbiotes for thousands of years, that they were free ever since those times. But in this episode, all the Sodan that were killed were targeted in their so called "symbiote patches". I mean what gives? The Sodan have returned suddenly to slavery?
 EDIT: Lol, that was obviously something very stupid to say, ignore it... I remember the whole thing now...   This post has been edited by KillerMarv: Jun 28th 2006, 5:48 PM |
|
|
|
| Dafmeister |
Jun 28th 2006, 5:51 PM
Post
#126
|
|
General Group: Moderators Posts: 11,926 Joined: April 10th 2003 From: North Wales, UK Member No.: 1,340 Gender: Male |
Near the beginning of the episode one of the Sodan says that another Sodan's symbiote is badly damaged. Teal'c says that the Sodan haven't been slaves to the Goa'uld for over 5000 years (or something that effect). Not being a slave doesn't mean they don't carry symbiotes.
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: May 19th 2013 - 8:35 AM |
|
||
|
|
|